Several months ago, when the iPhone 11 was launched, we shared an article with you about Apple A13 Bionic processor The new one and we wrote about it poetry and prose as he was a revolutionary wizard with a mighty performance at this time and at that time we made clear how much he outperformed other processors as well, but will after launching the new Snapdragon 865 processor from Qualcomm in the previous month, things remain the same? This is what we will tell you about today, carrying performance tests with us!
Comparison mode between Apple A processors and Snapdragon processors
In the past three years, Apple has always made remarkable progress in its processors in exchange for what the Android world offers in terms of processors, which is a vast world where we have Kirin processors from Huawei, Exynos from Samsung, Snapdragon from Qualcomm in addition to many slow processors from MediaTek! And in reality So Apple A11 processor For example, which appeared with the iPhone 8 in 2017, it achieved excellent performance against the processor Snapdragon 855 He is the Wizard of the Year 2019! Roughly speaking, the two therapists performed similarly.
If we download the Snapdragon 855 again and compare it with Apple A13 Bionic processor It is an Apple processor for the same year 2019, then we will find that the Apple processor has achieved an advantage of up to 25%, and perhaps this information is known to you, but if we took this information to the space of direct comparison and mentioned that the processor Snapdragon 865 Al Jadeed provides 20-25% higher performance than its predecessor, so we will find that it is in terms of numbers. Snapdragon 865 Performance = Apple A13 Bionic Performance!
NB: The term "processor" is used metaphorically for the chipset for smartphones, SoC – System on a Chip, which is in fact more than processors because it includes chips that include many things, including the processor itself! For example, the Apple A13 chip includes a central processor, a graphic processor, a neural engine ... and more!
Performance tests: Apple A13 processor against Snapdragon 865
Performance tests have been taken on the iPhone 11 Pro Max to measure the best possible performance for the Apple A13 processor, while the same tests have been carried out on a standard device developed by Qualcomm and this is because the new processors from Snapdragon have not been launched to the market yet! This device is known as a Qualcomm Reference Device (QRD) or Qualcomm Reference Device.
As for the tests for the older Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus was used! This is because the tests included the three processors, not just the newer processors, and they were also done through the SpeedTest GX 2.0 program
New Snapdragon 865 processor in green, Apple processor in yellow and old Snapdragon 855 processor in orange on top.
As you can see with the tests prepared by the AndroidAuthority site, the new Snapdragon processor is the winner, but for sure, the Apple A13 Bionic processor is still raising the cup in GPU performance, This is where the processor on the iPhone 11 Pro Max has finished performance tests on 3D Unity 14.5 seconds vs 16.9 seconds For the new Snapdragon 865 processor! Of course, the performance of the GPU graphics processor is the controller of the device's capabilities in dealing with high-quality games and videos.
AnTuTu Performance Tests .. Will they provide the same results?
Before we finish the article with you, there is no objection to sharing the AnTuTu performance tests for each of the Apple A13 Bionic processor and the new Snapdragon 865 processor with the old Snapdragon 855 processor and this is because many followers of the technical field give more confidence to the AnTuTu platform than others, and here are the results (which are not much different ):
So .. is the Snapdragon 865 processor better than the Apple processor?
The answer to this question does not have to be conclusive and deterministic, matters here are really relative, but if we take the language of numbers only without any other data, the answer will be yes. But on the other hand, it is more logical, as both processors are excellent, and the Apple processor is distinguished from its side in many things, including neurological processing and other things that we mentioned in our article on the Apple A13, which we put its link above.
Source:
If you install a jet machine instead of the processor and XNUMX gigabytes of RAM in the iPhone, what is useful for your device is dry, there are no features or technologies like Android 🤪🤪🤪🤪🔥
I think Apple processors are worthy of superiority, as they are built to provide the same performance over time and no matter how long it takes, unlike Snapdragon processors that only last until their first year and then die.
My brother, this is a problem with updates, not the processor, because with the passage of time the requirements for operating the newer system become higher, and there is no processor that slows down its performance after a while
Can an article be made about nanometer technology, that is, why is 5 nanometers better than 7 nanomaterials?
The pictures do not open in the application
I mean, I did not understand anything from the article
It is a leap, as I see it, in the evolution of the Snapdragon 865 chip over the Snapdragon 855.
I ask iPhone Islam to hire me as a volunteer just to correct the spelling and grammatical errors in the articles. Thank you.
Hey, could you mention grammatical and spelling errors in this particular article?
Thank you for your interest. We welcome you to join our site. Please send us an email on the website [email protected]
You have a CPU comparison error
this is correct
The latest Snapdragon processor on top is in orange XNUMX
Apple middle processor in yellow color A13
The old Snapdragon processor at the bottom is in green XNUMX
Thank you! God bless you
Thank you for the information
Oops!
Delayed news
welcome..
In fact, there is no news in reality. This is a comparison, not news.
Strong on its own
But once you put it in the junk Android phones, it will be slower than human growth 🌚
😁😁😁😁
When Snapdramon is placed in a device the real test is not a device made specifically for the processor
welcome
The device is not made specifically for the processor as you think .. It is just a device with adequate storage and random memory suitable for running the processor, on the contrary, manufacturers such as Samsung can produce better results than these by improving other factors, I talk to you in terms of hardware and not software.
Yes Khaled I would have said that, but maybe Editor's answer, Mustafa, was convincing to me.
Why do you not go to write in a blog for Android 🌚
A good article, processor speed is associated with the stability and smoothness of the system and its performance over time, for me an Apple processor is strong and system performance is as fast.
Yes, Apple will always be superior in the point of integration between system, gear, etc.
Thank you 🌹