US Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has ruled in the ongoing conflict between Apple and IPIC; IPIC had submitted a request to the judge to issue a temporary ruling suspending Apple's decision to delete both its account in the software store, as well as its Fort Knight game, until the main issue between the two companies is decided. The verdict was almost equal between the two parties. In the following lines, you know the details of the US judge’s decision.
Referee wallpapers
IPIC updated its app and added its own payment system, prompting Apple immediately To delete the application from the store; So IPIC decided to file a lawsuit against Apple, accusing it of monopoly and that it was blackmailing companies and taking illegal fees, so the response from Apple was to inform the company to permanently delete its account from the store, which means removing not only the company's other applications and games, but also removing the Unreal Engine, which is one of the company's most important products. Many developers have to develop popular games, including the popular PUBG game; Removing the account hurts developers as well. So IPIC submitted a request to the court to halt Apple's proceedings and postpone them until the case is finalized. Hours ago, the verdict was issued in this request.
Apple’s decision to delete Fortnite’s game
The judge said that Apple’s decision to delete the game sees it as a decision that does not violate any of the laws, as the company “Apple” has set certain rules and regulations for the software store and IPIC who decided on its own that these regulations are invalid and decided to violate them and accordingly Apple deleted the game. The judge said that IPIC was the one who placed itself in this situation and that it had caused harm to itself and that it should have sued Apple first and at the same time continue to abide by its own regulations until the ruling is issued But her single decision to violate store laws made the judge tend to stand with Apple and also because she does not find a strange commission imposed by Apple as the 30% fee is the same as in other stores. Accordingly, IPIC's request to stop Apple's decision to delete the game, which the company says will "cause harm that cannot be repaired," is not a logical request because it is the one who did the harm to itself and not Apple's decision. In short, Apple continues to prevent the game from being found in the store.
Apple's decision to delete the IPIC account and the Unreal Engine
The judge said that with regard to Apple's decision to delete the IPIC account, here the court believes that Apple went too far in the proceedings against IPIC and was unable to present evidence to the court stating that the continuation of the IPIC account and the famous game engine Unreal Engine exposes Apple to harm, but rather the opposite, as IPIC and other developers are exposed to harm from this the decision. The judge said that the continuation of the Epic Games account and their access to developer tools and Unreal Engine development does not violate any of Apple's current laws and regulations. Accordingly, the judge issued a decision to prevent Apple from deleting the company account, meaning that APIC can continue to access developer tools, develop the game engine, and even introduce new games and applications if She wanted "on condition of course complying with Apple's regulations."
Important clarification
This ruling is considered among the provisions of the urgent judiciary and is not a ruling in the case itself. That is, there is a legal conflict between IPIC and Apple and it is expected to continue for months or years, no one knows; However, during these long cases, some urgent matters occur that any party can say that there is harm that will be caused to it. It must be stopped now, and it is not possible to wait years for a ruling in the case. In other words, this ruling is not the end of the case, but rather stopping certain procedures of "deleting the company account" until the case is transferred to a chief judge, who decides what happens in the conflict between companies. It is noteworthy that the first session will be on September 28, that is, after a month and 3 days from now.
Source:
23 comment