Apple decided during a conference to be unveiled IPhone 12Removing the charger and headphone from the box of the new device as a step to reduce the company's environmental footprint. This is what Apple said ... But soon Apple was faced with great criticism and ridicule; And since we are always placed in the category of the accused in love with Apple and we only display what praises her (although this is not true), we decided to publish this article, which collects the most famous sarcasm, criticism, and even conspiracy theories that critics have talked about ... to clarify this article is not the opinion of the iPhone site Islam But it is the opinion of opponents and critics of Apple, and we decided to publish it for you to open the door for discussion. IPhone Islam may have another article to comment on this later. So, get acquainted with us on the criticism and whether some see that the point of electronic waste helps to make the world better.
Why did Apple abandon iPhone accessories?
"Customers already have more than 12 million wired headphones," said Lisa Jackson, Apple's vice president of environment, policy, and social initiatives at the iPhone 700 launch conference from the roof of the company's building and behind the green trees that Apple planted and solar cells that cover the place because of the environment. And many of them have moved on to experiment with wireless headsets. ”Also,“ There are more than two billion power adapters for Apple in the world, as well as billions of third-party adapters, and that is why Apple got rid of those elements in the iPhone case, to reduce carbon emissions and avoid mining and using valuable materials. ”
With fewer accessories included, the iPhone case is smaller. "The changes we made to the iPhone 12 reduced more than two million metric tons of carbon annually. This is like removing 450 cars from the road each year," says Lisa Jackson.
Of course, this step from Apple is welcome as long as Apple intends to reduce its environmental impact, but do Apple's efforts, as they claim, have an impact on the growing e-waste crisis that threatens the world?
What is e-waste
E-waste is the things that no longer have value, have reached the end of their life cycle, or have been disposed of, and include batteries, devices, phones, screens and cables.According to a report done in cooperation with the Global E-Waste Monitor and Rudiger Coyer, head of the Sustainable Cycles Program, the world has produced about 53.6 million Metric tons of e-waste last year, and this number will continue to rise, reaching 74 million metric tons by 2030, double the amount recorded in 2014.
And that scrap contains remnants of valuable components such as iron, copper and gold, and according to the previous report, the value of raw materials in global waste during 2019 amounted to about $ 57 billion, and unfortunately, much of that scrap ends up in developing countries.
So e-waste is not a threat to us? Of course, it is a danger to the world because it also contains toxic materials, as the same report indicates the presence of about 50 tons of mercury and 71 thousand tons of plastic, and these elements are toxic and greatly affect the health of people and the environment.
Apple claim
Apple routinely promotes its ongoing efforts to reduce toxic components in its devices.In its Environmental Progress Report 2020, the company said it spent 4 years researching and developing an alternative PVC, a material used in the power wire manufacturing process. The replacement material is not toxin-free, but Apple. It claims to have less toxicity and environmental risks.
But, did you know that the waste for charging devices coming from tablets, smartphones, etc., accounts for 0.1% of the total e-waste, and this percentage constitutes approximately 54000 metric tons of e-waste, which means that Apple's waste alone constitutes only about 25000 metric tons or 0.05% of the total increase in e-waste annually.
In addition, Kuyer says that the absence of a charging adapter in the iPhone box does not mean that people will not need it anymore, people may use what they have at home, but there are many who will buy adapters from Apple, which means that they will By packing these adapters and charging them separately from the iPhones, this will lead to an increase in the negative impacts on the environment.
Apple is playing with us
Apple claimed that the iPhone case has become smaller, which means more iPhone devices are shipped at one time on the mobile platform, but what many do not know is that Apple ships on demand and not on what the platform can afford, if an Apple store sells 100 An iPhone device, they will charge the same number even after the launch of the new device. The 200 devices will not be put suddenly because the platform is able to carry this number, but the charging is done on demand.
Also, Apple does not use a universal charging cable compatible with all its devices, unlike most companies that have switched to a USB-C cable for charging, connecting and transferring files, where the USB-C cable can charge the Facebook virtual reality headset and charge your smartphone from Samsung or Chromebook, but with Apple The situation is completely different, there is a need for two different cables to connect the iPad Pro and the iPhone and this leads to more e-waste.
The same thing last year, the iPhone 11 included a power adapter with a USB-A port, and today the iPhone 12 comes with a USB-C to Lightning cable only, which is not compatible with the adapter, unless you have a USB-C adapter affiliated to one end. Third, you will need a new adapter.
You are not convinced yet, here is something else, did you know that the European Union wanted to activate a unified charger initiative that can charge all phones, of course Apple was the one who categorically rejected the idea under the pretext that the initiative would stifle innovation, I saw the company accused of monopoly and killing competition on its platforms, concerned about Innovation stifle because the world wants to save the planet, but as long as saving the planet will be at the expense of its interests and profits, Apple has only two words "Damn the environment."
Does Apple care about the environment?
If Apple is really interested in saving the environment and reducing e-waste; It could have allowed users to repair their own devices instead of prohibiting the matter and considering it a major crime as Apple lobbied against legislation that required it to allow customers or non-affiliated centers the right to access the required resources in order to repair iPhones themselves.
Removing the charger is not a new idea
The idea of removing the charger from the phone box is not new, as George Paparezos, Director of Product Management at Qualcomm says, “This idea appeared years ago as a way to reduce the prices of phones that fall under the middle category, but it was not implemented because the standards and shipping ports were not uniform in these Period".
But nowadays, the whole world is united around the USB-C connector that you can find on Windows laptops and Macs, and in Android phones, headphones, iPads, and many other devices. Coupled with the open power delivery standard for charging the battery, the latest specifications allow the adapters to output Up to 100 watts, with the ability to shrink it if the connected device does not accept that much power.
Also, Qualcomm's new Quick Charge 5 protocol supports the PD standard and can output 100 watts, and Qualcomm claims that it can fully recharge the phone in just 15 minutes. The adapters included in many phones today are not enough to recharge larger devices that consume a lot of energy, but with the arrival of more high-powered chargers, Paparezos says, you will be able to carry a single adapter to charge your smartphone, tablet, or laptop with ease.
Point of view
We can conclude several reasons that made Apple abandon the new iPhone charger, the first of which was to sell the charger and other Apple accessories separately, and then make a profit margin, and removing the accessories will reduce costs after supporting the fifth generation networks, and Apple will not have to increase the price of the new device. The second reason is to reduce the size of the iPhone 12 case, and thus Apple has become able to pack and ship more iPhones coming from China at the same price it was paying before, which means lower costs for charging the iPhone, and the third reason is to equip the company’s users with the idea of switching to wireless charging during The coming period and the fourth and last reason is concern for the environment, which is not among the priorities of the American company, which is concerned only with how to dominate the smart phone market and make profits from its loyal users.
In the end, the rest of the smartphone manufacturers will follow the example of Apple, but not now, because they will wait to see the reaction of users and how this matter has affected the profits of the American company, so I expect with the beginning of the new year Android phones will appear without accessories in the box and the apparent reason of course In order to protect the environment.
A final word from the iPhone is Islam
Again for those who have not read the introduction; This article collects the most famous criticism of Apple on the point of the charger and the claim of preserving the environment, and this article means that Apple is deceiving customers. The publication of this article does not mean that we agree with everything mentioned in it, but we want to always present the other opinion and we even published it in sarcastic pictures as well; Of course, saying that we do not agree with everything mentioned does not mean that we mean that all of the aforementioned is not true. Rather, we just wanted to hear the opinion of Islam’s iPhone followers, and then later there will be an article to clarify our opinion on this topic. So tell us your opinion.
Source:
Thank you, brother, for the explanation, but from my point of view it is an unsuccessful step by Apple
I will look into these things in new phones
https://tatbekatnet.com/
The solution is simple ... boycott Apple.
Certainly the reason is purely economic and has no direct relationship to the environment! But Apple would have won the market in the new product “iPhone 12 if it had, and at least if it had brought the charger and headphone with only two devices, not the four, and that would give opportunities for buyers to choose in the type of purchase! Or you could have brought us companies and a handset in all the products this year, and then you say, for example, “On iPhone 13 We will cancel the chargers and the headphones.” “Save the environment.” 😉😉😏😏
You are right
Peace and mercy of God
Brother, you hit our heads with Apple, what it does, what it offers, and what it wants
Apple is the same as any other company, but more and more, then more, and more then Apple. What cares about how much it sold and how much it earned. The consumer does not care whether he is satisfied or is satisfied with presenting a product for profit, and this is something that no two disagree with
What I want to say is that Apple wants to make sure that people and those who are obsessed with its products are interested in a lot of prices and people punish people and want the benefit of customers in the price of the iPhone. But Apple has minds that offer you something without what they hide for you.
I presented the iPhone without a charger and without a headphone, and I got to you the idea that the iPhone is cheaper than it was and changed people's perception of the new charger, which will be stronger and faster than the first in the process of charging and content
But what they want, and what is hidden is greater, is that you go and buy the headphones and the chargers alone, and in this way they applied the same idea and reached the rest of what is in the pocket, and in the end they did not provide you with any new tangible content that you can benefit from as a consumer.
Widget said the software library said a separate charger and a separate headphone for the value. Did this help me buy a new iPhone technically or financially, or did it overburden me more and more?
I agree with some of the passages, but some of them are incorrect and exaggerated
Really
If he was afraid of the environment, he was the first to hear the words of the European Union about standardizing the charger, so that one charger charges all the devices or to move Apple cells make a charger alone that charges all its devices iPhone iPad watch, AirPods and Mac
First, I thank Von Islam for this article (the opinion and the other opinion), but the printing of companies, and it is their right, especially a huge company such as Apple, to look for its own benefit before anything else.
I do not think that what Apple went to is for the sake of the environment and human eyes, but to reduce its expenses on the one hand and additional income by selling these chargers separately on the other hand, and consumer awareness in dealing with these companies remains what forces Apple and others to reconsider many of its decisions
God bless
Apple is greedy, like other companies, and is only interested in profits
Right with the European Union to standardize charging wires.
But Apple is in the best interest of its priorities and in order to justify the matter, it said preserving the environment.
If it had reduced the price, we would have believed it, but the price is the same as the previous generations, which proves that Apple is looking for a large and fast profit margin with the least equipment ..
At least if they look like the others and replace the charging port with a type-c port, we might charge the charger for them.
Apple does not care about the environment. It only cares about its personal gain, and this step, unfortunately, will make the rest of the companies follow suit, which insists the consumer must take any measure to prevent this
In fact, this step is illogical from my point of view, because the headset does not last forever and must be changed when it is damaged, and from there the charging speed of the new device is very high compared to old devices and old chargers do not offer this speed, and from there the new USB cable C-While most of the old USB-A chargers are, how do I use them? Also, the efficiency of old chargers may decrease with time, and Apple always recommends using chargers in the box, and there are those who said that other companies' chargers are fully compatible with Apple, and Apple always recommends using Apple chargers, so people will have to pay more and buy an Apple charger, step by step Not successful.
The biggest company, by God, raising the price of mobile phones, is forbidden for you. Buy an Apple phone. What is it poor? What is it supposed to give us free tours for the poor? Thank you.
Apple is a nerdy company and above this phone, with a value of XNUMX, and there is no headphone, Huawei and Samsung charger, its mobile phone and mobile features are amazing, but people are famous.
Everything that has been said about Apple by critics is true & Apple's goal is only to increase profits and does not care about the environment! Be honest with yourself and do not be slaves to this company and agree with it on everything!!!
Ok, if the charger is cut off, the iPhone will be charged in the air, full of waste, even nuclear, left on the iPhone charger !! Unfortunately, Apple is a company with phones !!
The decision can be seen as a step to reduce costs with the adoption of 5G
But the problem is Apple's illogical excuses, they say you can use your old charger which is already slow and has a USB-A port.
Camels are a company ruled by narcissistic people who kill the victim and refute his murder in the most horrific ways .. a lie and greed that does not know the impossible, the slogan of which is to lie more
On the basis of if the shipper requested separately, it does not harm the environment
I see it as a very smart idea from Apple to increase its profits, meaning the old box has now become two boxes, and this is useful for charging devices and doubling production and shipping, as it is clear, prices have gone down and the value of the charger head has been reduced by XNUMX riyals, which means that Apple is not wrong and do not deceive customers!
As for the environmental problem, it is true that we go back to the first reason that the box is small, and this reduces the increase in the manufacturing burden.
The question remains, has the price of 12 devices been reduced after they removed the headphone and charger?
Your article drumming to the farthest limits, to the extent that it does not rise to the first grade essay of elementary school, stop laughing on the minds.
Wonderful report
Something annoying. One is seriously thinking about buying an Android phone.
In my opinion, the consumer is stronger than the manufacturer because if no one buys the new Apple devices, they will return to putting the charger and headphones when they see that they are losing money. This is nice. Tomorrow, I will go buy a car and they will tell me, “By God, it doesn’t have covers or upholstery so that we don’t pollute the environment.” I will tell them, “Keep your car with you and I will go buy it from someone else.” The same thing, Apple, keep your phone with you and I will go buy another device at that time, even if I have only used Apple devices in my entire life. But never mind. Don’t let Apple exploit the loyalty of its customers one day to encourage and greed it. After that, everything is paid for, from the box to the device to the stickers, even the printing of the words is paid for. These companies consider it boring and don’t give you anything for free. Even the box’s cost is calculated and paid for with the price of the device. Why do you want to remove the charger and headphones and make me go buy them separately at another price? They are laughing at me in a respectful way. What is this absurdity and disgrace? I don’t care about Apple and its devices.
Apple is ignoring its customers
I need to clarify how many points I want the site owners to respond to:
First, does the environment have a problem with the iPhone and the watch, and it has no problem with the iPad, which comes with a 20-watt charger in the box?
Second, is it possible to see Mac devices without a charger to protect the environment?
Third, why does Apple sell a charger that may harm the environment? Was it not better to stay away from selling it and advised users that this is one of the grave dangers that harm the environment
Fourth, which is more dangerous to the environment, the charger or the battery? Why did Apple not dispense with the phone battery and keep the charger, considering that the battery is more dangerous and greater than the charger?
Fifthly, Apple accessories that spoil their use by about five months were not harmful to the environment and are still considered to be e-waste
Sixth: Is the iPhone device without any component that could harm the environment? Why shouldn't Apple sell the iPhone case in the instruction manual? This device is harmful to the environment, and it does not include the device, charger and headphone
Seventh, does damage to the environment not apply to France, or is it fear of laws?
Eighth, after intentional damage to the user, he was not supposed to be compensated, or reduce the price of the shipper to 5 or 10 dollars, instead of greed and theft under the pretext of the environment.
If you compare the price with the previous Xs, they will receive a lower price
The truth, in my opinion, is that the environment is the last concern of Apple, but increasing profit is the actual driver of all Apple's productive or marketing strategies.
The environment is a scapegoat that Apple hangs on to reduce costs so that the iPhone 12 does not come at a price higher than its predecessors, although the company has an interest in the environmental aspect, but not in the device’s accessories that cannot be used by the father and will be sold to him again and manufactured again, and thus the price of the new iPhone has increased by an amount ranging from 30 to 70 dollars, but in an indirect way.
The fact that the green pretext is a tenuous argument will not convince anyone, even Apple fans
I am with those who mentioned that not accompanying the charger with the iPhone 12 is a ploy by Apple to raise the expected profit margin by selling the charger separately and making additional profits ... as it was supposed to reduce the price of the iPhone as long as the charger and wired headphones were withdrawn, but we almost found that the prices are still As they are, customers have lost their charger and wired headphones.
Apple I don't know what Apple is
This year paralyzed the headset and the charger
Next year, iPhone 13 without cable and an exaggerated price
Next year iPhone 14 without SIM card slot
IPhone 15 will be available 🤔
Simple comment, the price of the iPhone has decreased by XNUMX dollars, and this helps to buy the charger if you are not charging the phone wirelessly ..
How happy I am from Apple not to talk about that profitable deal for it by losing customers. I am a lover of Apple and I have not seen any change in the battery or its enlargement, because the smallest phone of Samsung or Huawei etc. has a battery of XNUMX m with an Apple account, because the current iPhone XNUMX does not reach this capacity. I have an iPhone XNUMX with me and my colleague is with you a Samsung phone that is not mentioned in the price nor the capabilities. Its battery is better than my phone. This makes me feel shock and confusion together from Apple in not developing the battery
Apple is very good at using device resources as it uses much less energy than Android devices. So a 2800 mAh battery in the iPhone might have the same efficiency as a 3500 or 4000 mAh battery.
Incorrect talk. I mean, if I buy a 20-watt Type-C charger from the market, it will not harm the environment.
I think that there is no problem because if I want to sell the iPhone that I currently have, I will sell it without a charger so that I do not have to buy a new charger😉
Many talk about the environment and its preservation.
Nonsense .
The ship, for example
These ships burn the equivalent of one billion metric tons of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
I mean, the problem of charging and the headset is nothing but trade and making money.
And the poor one is the consumer.
Greetings to the team
Unconvincing talk, especially after changing the cable to Type C
It is very clear
As Apple did before with the 3.5mm headphone jack,
The company is preparing to move to wireless charging, after the introduction of MagSave with the iPhone XNUMX, so that it will be the future of charging in the next, and third-party companies will begin to provide their products and flood the market with many innovations that will allow Apple to adopt this method of charging easily and easily….
There is no disagreement about the company's intelligence in marketing and providing what you want at any time you want, and the rest of the companies will follow suit as they did with the 3.5-inch input and the notch, in addition to the prices of phones reaching amounts exceeding $XNUMX, and all of this was started by Apple...
Whether we agree or not, Apple will remain a leader in the field of smartphones and control its strategies, and there is no consolation for the rest of the companies except to follow the example of Apple and do as they do.
I totally agree with your words
The significance of Apple's deleting a charger is a new technology coming from the company, which is charging in ways that do not need a charger
I think Apple is too greedy. I honestly don't think I'll buy a new iPhone anymore. And I won't even renew the iPad.
Take it from me, my brother, as long as you are working. Do not think to change unless I need to
I have been using all Apple devices for more than 10 years, but honestly I got bored of them. There is nothing new in the iPhone 12. What good is 5G if I am in the office and at home there is wifi. And I never believed the environment story from the first moment. It's just greed. Especially since we all expected Apple to do this to reduce device prices. I was shocked by the price hike and the removal of the charger and headphones in the time of Corona. I don't know how these people think. But people got bored of them. If there was a real alternative to Apple, they would have switched to it a long time ago.
I think the options are available, but we were addicted to Apple
For me
I see that the American company has put this excuse in order to convince people of that, but in fact it has made the device without a charger and earphone at the same price or a little more expensive, and also it will sell larger quantities and will sell the charger and headphone separately.
I don’t think the environment in the company’s accounts has any interest as it claimed but put the reason to convince people
Apple is playing with us ?! I hope to stay away from such expressions and write in explanatory terms without accusations and negative words ... I am not an employee of Apple.
Only one reason and its relationship to the environment is that it is greed and nothing but greed, especially after raising the prices of the new iPhone to astronomical prices, which makes this my last iPhone
A special article, God bless you. I agree with you
Apple's concern for the environment is not true. The French versions are sold with all the device's contents. The prices are exaggerated. Whether you steal the charger or the headphones, they are still light years behind the rest of the companies. They finished with 5G, 120 frequencies, the small notch, the fingerprint inside the screen, and the giant batteries, and Apple has just woken up and added 5G.
I am an iPhone user. All the criticism mentioned is realistic and correct.
If I want to update my iPhone, I will not buy an iPhone anymore.
All that matters to me in the iPhone is the system, safety, and compatibility between the system and the device (this gives speed and smoothness in continuous use)
But now I think that the Android system and phones operating with this system have become very advanced. It fulfills the purpose.
Many iPhone users thought that if they wanted to update their devices, they would not buy another iPhone.
I'd rather buy a phone with a USB C charging slot. And without a charger is better than an iPhone without a charger.
Because with one cable, I can use it for the computer, the headset, and the phone…. I will not have to buy another cable
Apple's words are not convincing for two reasons:
XNUMX- It did not remove the charging port, meaning that we should only buy its charger.
XNUMX- It still sells charger separately.
On the one hand, I am with Apple and that is because most people have a cable and charger at home.
On the other hand, it was among the first for Apple to reduce the price of the iPhone in exchange for removing the cable and charger from the iPhone case, so that it would appear that it is honest in what it says about its concern for the environment
Respected brother Ali, not most people have a charger and a cable that is used to charge the iPhone 12, for example the iPhone 11 charger has a capacity of 18 watts, while the iPhone 12 comes with a capacity of 20 watts, and the rest of the Apple chargers such as the iPhone 10 and below come with a capacity of 5 watts, so whoever buys a new iPhone must buy He has a new charger, and this is what Apple will sell him for at a price of $ 60 at the very least. The issue is purely commercial and the poor environment does not come to that.
The main goal in my opinion is to keep the price without the increase by reducing the cost of some accessories to compensate for the increase from other parts such as 5G
Actually, most of the angry people have headphones and chargers that have not yet been used
Preserving the environment is an added benefit, not the main cause
I see that it is a completely unsuccessful step from Apple, from my point of view the only thing distinguished about this phone is 5G and soon it will be available in all phones for all different operating systems, thank you for publishing, greetings.
Getting rid of the charger and headphone is a very provocative step and it is not calculated by Apple, the issue of the environment is a failed argument, a word of truth, which is wanted false, not everyone has the ability to buy expensive wireless headphones, there are people who collect money a year until you can buy a device from Apple, and after that the shock The box is empty ..
The rest of the companies will imitate Apple, it is only a matter of time.
The goal is not to protect the environment from e-waste .. The goal is to profit from selling these accessories.
I argue that the issue is not an environment nor those who grieve
Most of all is the profit from selling the charger and headphone separately and configuring the user for the wireless charger
These reasons are sufficient to show what Apple wants, especially when it developed the 5G technology, so I took this step not to raise the price of the phone, but in the end all devices will come without accessories due to the transfer of all companies to wireless charging in the near future, especially Apple started planning from now to that day
Apple is subject to its customers if the goal of removing the charger is to preserve the environment Why is the price of the phone high on the previous iPhone XNUMX and why Apple produced four phones and why Apple manufactures shipping items for the customer to buy and in this case, the customer will buy shipping items from Apple at a price of $ XNUMX From my point of view, I want answers to these questions. If Apple invokes the preservation of the environment, this reflects on the customer from a loss in the phone and the purchase of the charger, there is a question: What did Apple do for the customer? Thank you.
Apple's argument is a lie, if reducing the size of the iPhone box reduces emissions by 2 million metric tons, then this shortage will be compensated for by wall charger head boxes, and perhaps more than that, the issue is to compensate for the losses of transferring the manufacturing of Apple phones from China to India
Very beautiful and well-done words, of course.
Thank you wonderful world قال
A lie playing with people's minds, in short, if the fear is for the environment, then there is no need to manufacture more than two phones, and it was only sufficient for them to make two phones, and the strange thing is that there are technicians to justify
This is the stupidest decision in my opinion that Apple has made since its existence, selling the most expensive iPhone in the world will put the customer in the hands of gangs making forged electronics and may disable the phone that I spent maybe a month's salary, and curse the day I bought it ...
Apple deals with us as we do. Our politicians make decisions, and you must implement without discussion or argument ...
I am an Apple fan but I will not buy a new expensive phone and charge it with an old charger…
I will honor all those who have made him angry with this decision. We hope that you will make a referendum and send it to Apple, so that you may feel who is spending money on it ...
I have advice for all my friends. I love Apple, but I do not own the phone behind the phone, but rather I have seen a little until two or three phones go out, and one phone has been acquired that includes the advantages of three phones ...
Peace be upon you
Your brother Radwan al-Maghribi.
A very wonderful article, may God give you wellness 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Apple treats us like we were stupid, and it's the smartest
Justifications for the environment and others
I felt that it was Trump who is doing this work, reducing costs and output, and increasing income and interest
And God hated Apple and stopped buying its devices.
Apple seeks to increase profits, and even a building that prides itself on the greenness of its components is made to save energy to reduce expenses
Apple provided the price of the charger, the speaker, the value of shipping and the space in its stores, and we still pay the price of the device as if it contains what is missing from it
In the end, the customer will buy the charger from Apple or others, but the fate of Apple like Nokia and others..I see it sooner than ever.
Preserving the environment is a right that I want void
Everyone claims a connection to Laila ... and Laila does not acknowledge that to them ...!
Is Apple really concerned with the environment
It is not strange for her to do this ,, most of the components of the device are recycling of materials ,, but removing the charger under the pretext of protecting the environment, this is called laughing at the chins 😂
Removing the charger is a bold step from Apple and adding features to the phone, a big move and reducing the size of the carton contributes to the transfer of a large amount of them to the market, and another opinion was possible that you included in the phone, but the prices will differ completely away from the issue of preserving the environment to create new markets.
Vanity kills Apple .. And some people believe that Apple is the only one capable of creating new ideas that help us live on this planet and perhaps on this galaxy ……. Apple's obvious exploitation of its fans, and perhaps its foolishness as well.
* The subject of lying in and of itself is placed on the cuff alone * I did not imagine that Apple would fall into polytheism with all this stupidity ..
Why shouldn't there be an Arab company that has its own system and its own phones, and we buy its devices and support this company, and we do not put our trust and our money in the hands of companies that only care about profit and sing about the issue of privacy. About myself, I hope so and this is easy to achieve ..
#Apple_Lied
Hi
I think the primary goal is to reduce costs and increase profits. Where Apple is stingy in providing some technology and encouraging in maximizing profits, but this is the case for all profitable companies in one way or another.
Apple products, like the rest of the world’s products, have advantages that attract some and disadvantages that repel others, but we do not deny that it is a company that leads the market and has great designs, and the compatibility between the operating system and device resources and the integration of its products with each other is perfect.
With many thanks to those in charge of the site iPhone Islam
In return, Apple must reduce the price of the device, as its fixed price means that it profits from this movement.
Look
If the price of the iPhone case has decreased, the price of the charger and headphone is not included in the pricing
Here I can trust Apple
And if the price of the box remains the same as the previous one, I say to Apple
An excuse worse than guilt
And your safety
Make the solution your own, Apple. Keep your device, as there is no difference between 12 and before.
With all due respect to the company and its developers
I think that the real reason behind canceling and deleting accessories with iPhone 12 is in the first place
Greed and exploitation of people and an increase in their sales
Because they know that I am indispensable to both of us and the charger and the headphones of all kinds
I have a question as they say it affects his environment, so why sell it?
All nonsense, love of money first, and this is the reality
Greetings to everyone
What type of encapsulation (backing) for the upcoming MagSafe cable?
The most important point really - if they were concerned with the environment, they would have worked on modifying the port to usb-c so that they would lighten the cables and make the Mac, iPad, iPhone, Android devices and the whole world the same - unfortunately the whole world in an iPhone charger and charger is in another valley - and it is strange that all Apple devices come with a usb-c charger And the iPhone only remains with a different charger !!!
I think that Apple is taking a new step in order to control the market of smartphones and tablets, but there is greed on its part, as despite the removal of the accessories from the box, the iPhone 12 came in all its types at somewhat high prices, and this is not justified because the iron in these phones, despite their quality and strength, does not It lives up to the requirements of apple lovers, adding that it has put a $ 30 increase in price to get a phone without a subscription, and the price in the upper category, according to what I heard, rises to $ 50, and this proves once again that Apple’s goal is to compensate for profits lost from them, especially during the period of the Corona pandemic
In fact, everyone seeks to save, but the heart of those who have the courage to change and do what they think is right
Whether what Apple does is correct or wrong, I think that it is taking a new step in the world of shipping to get rid of the charging port that during this period no one of the companies has dared to delete and replace it.
In fact, everyone is materialistic but works his way
One last point is always your articles, Walid, causing chaos 😂
You work your way like Apple
Hi
I’m saying a blasting, buying a cellphone without a charger
Apple
Buy then melt to get him a fake charger from the market. This is what is the logic and what is ever coming from them