During an online interview with Tim Cook at the VivaTech conference, which is the largest event for startups and technology in Europe, the CEO of Apple spoke for half an hour about privacy and the future of augmented reality. He also highlighted the superiority of iOS over Android, and this is what we will focus on in the following lines By knowing what distinguishes the iPhone operating system from Android from Tim Cook's point of view, and what about the European DMA law.
Digital Markets Law
Europe intends to discuss a proposed Digital Markets Act (DMA or Digital Markets Act), which Cook said “would not be in the interest of the user.” This legislation, first revealed last December, could lead to major changes to the App Store and pre-installed first-party apps on Android devices. The iPhone.”
According to Tim Cook, the legislation could lead to changes that "seriously damage the security of iPhones" as a new law in Europe would force Apple to allow parallel downloading or sideloading of apps (meaning downloading apps away from the Apple Store). , something Cook vehemently rejects, and that's what he made clear when he pointed out that Apple's acceptance of parallel or sideloading means there won't be features like privacy stickers and app tracking transparency in the App Store anymore.
iPhone is more secure than Android
"I would say parallel downloading is going to hurt privacy and security," said Tim Cook. "I mean, you look at malware as an example where Android has 47 times more malware than iPhone, why?" Because at Apple we designed iOS so that there is one app store and all apps are reviewed before they are released to the store, this keeps a lot of this malware out of our ecosystem, which is why users always tell us how much they value it, so we will defend the user in the discussions and we will see Where it will go, I am an optimist and I think most people who are looking for safety know that this is a huge challenge.”
Cook's comments come at the same time that similar legislation has been proposed in the United States with a set of proposals in Congress that would not allow Apple to install its own applications on iPhone devices in the United States.
One of the bills is known as the US Online Innovation and Choice Act, which, if implemented, would ban companies that own platforms and stores such as Apple and Google from giving an advantage to their products, services, and business lines over competitors, harming competing products, services, and business lines, or even discriminating between similar business users. Where Apple has been accused of exercising a monopoly within its store by making its own applications in the forefront, followed by competitors’ applications, as it sometimes removes other applications or puts obstacles in front of it in favor of its affiliated applications, as well as the thorny issue that is still in the courts between it and Epic, through which it was revealed Many very important information that confirms the validity of Apple's dominance of its store and the iPhone operating system.
Finally, perhaps Apple is not a perfect company and of course no one is perfect, but it is a company looking for profit, growth and dominance, like the rest of the giant companies, so it tries to get rid of competitors and make billions, so what others may consider monopolistic behavior, I consider it steps in my view to protect its interests and increase its profits and expansion .
Source:
29 comment