New report: Apple's CSAM image inspection feature is a "terrifying technology"

Apple planned to include CSAM screening technology in iOS 15 but had to delay the feature's launch indefinitely due to strong pressure and a backlash against CSAM that forced the company to pause its plans. It seems that the decision to postpone was a right idea from Apple to calm the atmosphere until a new report appeared that overthrew the feature completely, and perhaps Apple would receive and forget to provide its advantage anymore.


dangerous technique

In a new report, an influential group of 14 internationally recognized security researchers said such schemes (meaning CSS or client-side scanning) are a dangerous technology that expands government surveillance powers. It would be more an invasion of privacy than anything else that has been proposed to weaken the encryption process. Instead of reading the content of encrypted communications, Apple's new feature gives law enforcement the ability to remotely search not only communications but information stored on user devices.

These voices join similar voices, including civil liberties activists, privacy advocates and technology industry critics, who have already warned that these kinds of features threaten basic human rights.

Although the system announced by Apple seemed well-intentioned, its use to check what's inside the device against image databases in the form of digital hash data has alarmed many. After all, if the device could be scanned for one thing, the process could easily be expanded in order to look for other things and this was taken into account as some governments turned out to be working on just that. The cybersecurity field who was studying proposals of this kind before Apple announced its CSAM feature.


The European Union plans to use the Apple feature

Researchers say they began researching that CSS technology before Apple announced in response to moves by European Union leaders to insist on such a system. CSAM also includes scanning for evidence of organized crime and terrorist activity but there is a problem other than privacy that what is seen in some countries as normal behavior is criminalized in others In addition, if Apple is forced to enable its new feature by the European Union to search for Other things and not child abuse images will not be able to resist and will eventually give in and do as they are asked.

Note: Did you know that everyone wants to monitor all crimes except for one crime, which is fraud and tax evasion


Expert Warnings

One big problem that researchers recently warned about is that the plan allows a person's devices to be wiped without any potential cause for anything illegal to happen, and Susan Landau, a professor of cybersecurity and politics at Tufts University, said it's very dangerous. It poses a risk to business, national security, public safety and privacy,” while Ross Anderson, a professor of security engineering at the University of Cambridge, said “Expanding the state’s surveillance powers is already crossing red lines.”


Pandora's box

Experts have warned that these monitoring and control capabilities can be misused by competitors, government agencies, and even by criminals and hackers, and within the employees who implement them, and the opacity of mobile operating systems makes it difficult to verify that the scanning system will only target material whose illegality is indisputable.

Finally, once such a system is in place, it is only a matter of time until criminal entities figure out how to undermine or expand it to discover valuable personal or business data or introduce false positives against certain people. If it opens, all kinds of evil that we don't want will appear.

What do you think about the feature to scan users' devices and what might happen when it falls into the wrong hands, tell us in the comments

Source:

Columbia University

12 comment

comments user
Husam

It is possible to move to less intelligent services such as dropbox, but the problem is that you will lose all the advantages of searching in images through faces or sites, in the sense that the images will return to being data, not information.

comments user
Ahmed Mahmoud

I think the best opinion is not to use the camera for personal photos and to use any external means to shoot with an external memory - and the phone will lose its most important feature, which will affect sales volume - and it will inevitably change the way the device is used

comments user
Mohammed

The legal principle in all the legislation of the world is that no person is subject to a search unless there is a reason or suspicion that calls for a search of a particular person.

This technology is a clear demolition of this principle, as it subject all users to inspection (even if it is digital) like someone who throws a pole in the sea to fish randomly

Then there is another very important point … in the event that a suspicious image is found, there is a human examination of the image by Apple employees to confirm or deny the suspicion before informing the authorities

Who gave Apple the legal right and permission to see a user's personal photos without their work? Is Apple a judicial or governmental body to enjoy this power?

Then, if the suspicion is not proven, what is the procedure that will take place after that?
No one talked about informing the user that he had photos that were disclosed to Apple employees, nor about the number of photos, the number of people familiar with them, and their personalities, and no one talked about compensating the user for the harm resulting from the violation of his privacy
This is a very important matter, as ignoring this matter means that you, as a user, are not secure in your privacy and your photos have become common to people you do not know.

comments user
cloudy

If you are not ashamed, do whatever you want

comments user
Suleiman Mohammed

The loss of privacy is the focus of any digital material, whether it is stored in the device or announced to iCloud and its sisters.
The consequences of imposing restrictions mean that the entire industry is going backwards, the reluctance of many, and the emergence of parallel systems that seek to evade oversight

comments user
Ahmad ali

It would be a serious mockery if Apple did it, and other companies would inevitably follow against it, otherwise they would be accused of sponsoring the crime!
The solution for me, if this happens, God forbid, is to cancel the use of the camera and avoid storing any image in the device or the iCloud. And use a separate camera. I know that I will be criticized here and the impossibility of this solution, but for every abnormal action there is another abnormal action, unfortunately

comments user
﮼heart ﮼ ﮼red

The best thing is to upload photos to icloud

comments user
﮼heart ﮼ ﮼red

By God, nothing is safe for pictures

comments user
﮼heart ﮼ ﮼red

If Apple implements it, all companies will implement it

comments user
Ahmad Al Harthi

If Apple approves and uses this technology, I'll head over to Google and leave Apple. Especially since I recently became disinterested in the iPhone. I see insufficient annual updates and unjustified iPhone prices

7
5
    comments user
    present

    Likewise, Google will follow it if you did not do it previously and secretly

    comments user
    Nasser Al-Ziyadi

    But Android devices are also expensive, and sometimes they are more expensive than iPhones!!! As for updates, in the world of Android, forget something called updates!! Apple is a pioneer in basic and security updates

    5
    1

Leave a response