The first benchmark results are out for the Apple M2 Ultra chip, Apple's latest chip, available in the new Mac Studio and Mac Pro models launching next week. With these results, we have a closer look at the performance of these segments compared to others. The first test results of the M2 Ultra chip appeared on Geekbench 6, which provides a closer look at the processor's performance improvements.
According to the results, it appears that the Mac Studio with the M2 Ultra chip gets a score of 2800 for single core, and gets a score of 21700 for multi core. These scores confirm that the M2 Ultra chip delivers significant performance gains over the M1 Ultra chip.
The Apple M2 Ultra chip delivers up to 20% faster performance than the previous M1 Ultra chip, Apple announced. This means that the M2 Ultra chip is the fastest chip Apple has ever launched.
Interestingly, the benchmark results indicate that the new Mac Pro is expected to deliver nearly twice the overall CPU performance compared to the fastest Mac Pro equipped with a 28-core Intel Xeon W processor. What's even more impressive is that the new Mac Pro has a starting price of $6, while the 999-core model had a starting price of $28, nearly double the price.
During the keynote in WWDC ConferenceApple stated that the new Mac Pro can be up to three times faster than the Intel model in some professional tasks such as video transcoding and XNUMXD simulation, meaning the improved performance of the new Mac Pro is particularly noticeable and significant in these specific business areas.
It is recommended to choose Mac Pro over Mac Studio; Because it provides six PCIe ports, or peripheral components, that can be upgraded as needed, so you can add any sound cards, modems, or monitors. This allows for more flexibility in terms of upgrading and customizing your device to your liking. And if these ports are not important to you, then the Mac Studio processor with the M2 Ultra is the most cost-effective option, so you can save about three thousand dollars compared to the Mac Pro,
The M2 Ultra chip has 134 billion transistors, which is 20 billion more than the M1 Ultra chip. Its unified memory supports up to 192GB, 1% more than the M50 Ultra, and has a memory transfer speed of 800GB/s, which is twice the processor of the M2 Max.
The M2 Ultra has a processor that's 20% more powerful than the M1 Ultra as mentioned above, a graphics processor that's up to 30% larger, and a Neural Engine that's up to 40% faster.
Both the new Mac Studio and Mac Pro are available to order now, and will start reaching customers and in stores starting Tuesday, June 13.
Source:
I have a question, does the M2 processor in the iPad give the same performance as the M2 on the MacBook Air, or is the nomenclature similar?
No, it is not a similarity of names, it is the same processor, but you should know that Apple controls the number of cores in terms of the processor and graphics, but the performance is similar between Macs and iPads
“It is recommended to choose Mac Pro over Mac Studio; Because it provides six ports called “PCIe” or peripheral components, used for upgrading as needed, so that you can add RAM or any sound cards, modem or monitor. No RAM can be added to the Mac Pro and the ports are only for adding a graphics card, additional hardware, or third-party accessories. RAM cannot be added at all
From the release of the Apple processor, I expect a revolution in performance. Indeed, what we see from the language of numbers is something we may not imagine! What will it be like after 3 years?!
Let's see the big picture: fast processors, devices with high-resolution screens, fast networks, greater reliance on web applications and the cloud, self-driving cars with entertainment services, mixed reality like we see in Apple glasses, artificial intelligence... All this gives the idea that Apple's processors are pushing We are a high performance industry.
Hello Abdulaziz Al-Muqbali! 😃 There is no doubt that Apple processors are constantly evolving and achieving great successes. 3 years later? It is difficult to predict exactly, but it is certain that the evolution will continue and we will see greater improvements in performance and technology. The future looks bright thanks to these developments! 🚀🌟
Is there any information about a new iMac, or do we rely on God and have to buy an iMac Pro XNUMX?!
Up?!
Correction: Mac Pro only allows PCIe cards to be added, and RAM cannot be added as written in the article.
I have a question, why are all the articles a literal translation from foreign websites? Of course, you mention the sources, and this is respected. Why are there no longer articles edited by Evon Islam as it was in the past? I have been following the site for more than ten years, and one of the first users of Zamen, may God have mercy on it
Peace, mercy and blessings of God
May God reward you for your interaction, despite the passage of ten years, but it is your fault, because you acted weakly.
If you hit the editors with words that hurt them, they would be more creative. But note that the news does not come from the Arab world, as Apple offers us very little material, and technology can no longer hit opinions on it like in the past, now everything is clear.
But do not worry, we will take your advice and write more articles containing our point of view.
And then 😂 Every little upgrade, improvements, and renewals of most programs and games no longer need all this power. The current consumption of programs and games uses only XNUMX% of the hardware power at its maximum state.
Hi Abdullah Salahuddin! 😄 There is no doubt that the rapid development of Apple technology is surprising. However, these advances benefit users who work in areas that require high processing power, such as editing, design, and programming. In addition, the use of this power may increase in the future with the emergence of new programs and games that require more optimization powers. Always looking for the best! 🚀