During a recent company-wide meeting, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta (formerly Facebook), spoke about Apple Vision Pro glasses. And according to The Verge, Zuckerberg commented that Apple's Vision Pro didn't come up with any "magic bullets" that Meta hadn't already thought of. He also highlighted that the Vision Pro costs significantly more than the Quest 3 that Meta recently announced in a preview ahead of the official launch later this year. Here's everything Zuckerberg said about Apple Glass.
When we made a video about the Vision Pro glasses from AppleThe first thing we mentioned was that we hope to see Mark Zuckerberg's reaction, and the reason is that Facebook changed its name to Meta, and its product that it is betting on is augmented reality, and now Apple has entered as a strong competitor, offering technologies that Meta could not achieve, and most likely will not be able to To reach this quality, the reason is that Apple designs the operating system and hardware itself, so everything is airtight. As for Meta, it uses Android as an operating system, and it adopts Qualcomm processors.
Zuckerberg emphasized that Apple's announcement highlights the disparity in values and visions between the two companies. As the goal of Mita is to provide products at reasonable prices, targeting a wide audience, and this is evident in the price difference between the products of the two companies, as the price of the Apple Vision Pro glasses is $ 3499, which is equivalent to seven times the price of the soon-to-be Quest 3 glasses, which is $ 499. Only, the Quest Pro is $999.
Zuckerberg also noted that Meta is primarily focused on social metaverses, working to create interaction between people and make them feel close in new ways. He said his device is also about "being active and doing things." While the Apple Vision Pro glasses seem to promote isolation. He acknowledged that Apple's approach could represent the future of computing, but expressed that it did not align with his own vision.
Zuckerberg's notes revealed that he was curious and waiting to see what Apple would come up with. He said he had not seen it yet, and had expressed interest in understanding its features, use, and impact on people's experiences.
Based on his initial observations, Zuckerberg noted that Apple's glasses did not provide any exceptional solutions that Meta had not already explored. All of these solutions were before his team, and they were well studied and thought about. He highlighted the high-resolution screen of the Apple Vision Pro glasses, and all the technical components placed in the glasses, which cost seven times more than the Quest 2 glasses, and said that all of these components require a lot of energy; That's why it needed an external battery with a wired connection to provide the necessary power.
Zuckerberg said that Apple's design decisions may be appropriate for intended use cases, and these are contradictory values and visions between the two companies.
This means that Apple made a deliberate decision regarding the design of the Vision Pro and its components. This decision involved sacrificing or trading off some trait or aspect in favor of others. Such as including a high-resolution screen, offset by the increased cost and the need for an external battery with a wire connected, and this may be appropriate for specific use cases or a target audience that Apple intends to meet its needs.
In other words, while design trade-offs may have their own advantages for specific purposes, they may not align with the meta approach or objectives that are set for their products.
Zuckerberg affirmed Meta's commitment to ensuring its products are accessible and affordable to all users, while highlighting the sales success of its Quest glasses.
And he said, it became clear to everyone that the demonstrations provided by Apple showed people using Vision Pro glasses while sitting alone on the sofa. Meta's vision for Metaverse is focused on social interaction and facilitating new ways of connecting people.
Shortly before the Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC), Meta provided a preview of the upcoming Quest 3 mixed reality headset. Scheduled for release later this year, it features a slimmer, more ergonomic design, a high-resolution screen, and double the graphics performance compared to the Quest 2. The glasses will be available starting at $499 with 128GB of storage, and Meta plans to reveal more details. In an event on September 27th.
I wish you would shut up and not talk 🙂
This person only speaks of envy
Apple is always tweeting out of the flock, and many are waiting to open reservations for the watch to buy it, and I am one of them
Competition between companies produces quality products and reduces the price, but competition in words without the presence of an actual competing product and without appreciation for the efforts of others leads to the dominance of one company over another. Despite Apple's opportunism, it cannot be denied that it offers a good product and seeks development and preference
Hello Lion of Sohar 🦁! I totally agree with you that competition between companies leads to higher quality products and lower prices. Indeed, Apple offers good products and is always striving for development and innovation. 😃👍
Both of them have no actual benefits and no uses that the person needs, and they seem miserable attempts to withdraw the money of the company’s users, gimmick and worthless
In XNUMX, Apple presented an invention that changed the history of mankind in the use of mobile phones, and here it is, in XNUMX, a technological revolution will be presented that will change the way we use mixed reality glasses. This is only the beginning, and with each year, Apple will develop the product until it becomes stronger, with competitive advantages and a stronger battery, until it reaches the average end user at an affordable price.
Hello Ahmed! 😄 Yes, Apple is always evolving and offering great technologies. In 2007, it revolutionized the world of mobile phones, and now it is preparing to make a big change in the world of mixed reality with Vision Pro glasses. We expect more developments and innovations from Apple in the future to make this technology available to all users at affordable prices. 🚀👓
In terms of quality, no one doubts the quality of Apple devices
As for which of the two glasses will be more common and widespread, it is definitely the Meta glasses
In terms of price, on the one hand, it uses the Android system
For me, the comparison is like comparing FIFA 1998 and FIFA currently 2022 haha
Hi Hamdoun! 😄 Haha, really, the comparison between FIFA 1998 and FIFA 2022 reminds us of the rapid development in the world of technology. Thanks for your comment and follow us for more tech topics! 📱💻🚀
The fox asked if you challenge grapes, he told them it was sour hahaha Mark can't use Apple technology and that's why he's just talking out of jealousy
We did not know yet how to charge the glasses? Wireless or Lightning or USB C
Hi Ali Jasim! 🌟 Don't worry, I will answer your question about how to charge the Apple Vision Pro glasses. The glasses need an external battery connected to a wire to provide the necessary power for it. Charging is expected via the USB-C port. 😊
By God, I find that Mark has the right.. These glasses are for the rich only.. I am a fan of technology, and I spend lavishly on them and buy most of the Apple products.. XNUMX thousand Saudi riyals is an astronomical amount.. and it is equivalent to XNUMX million Syrian pounds in my country, Syria.. an amount It can feed and clothe XNUMX needy families for a full year.. The glasses may have technology that is worth this amount.. But I think that the money that I might pay for this technology is better if I go to those who need it.
Michael writes a sentence in history that there is no place for Facebook, Meta and its accessories other than social gossip applications, and if better competitors appear, then the market will be purged from Meta.
It is inherently defective to compare a primitive gaming glasses such as what Bad Al-Zikrberg has with what the apple provided. To provide a comparison, we have to list all the features of Vision Pro only because the counterpart from Mita does not exist, O Allah, from a trivial primitive game.
Hi Suleiman Mohamed! 😄 There is no doubt that every company has its own vision and goals in developing its products. For Apple and Meta, there appears to be a difference in focus and strategy. Despite this, both Apple Vision Pro and Meta products can offer different and unique experiences to users depending on their needs and expectations. 🍏🤖 Always remember that diversity is the key to innovation!
Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha, I haven't laughed at a statement like that in a long time
Gololo to Mark Zuckerberg Dam Bozek Remember the password dadadadada
We have a popular proverb in Palestine that says (What brought you to hello) in reference to the greatness of something for something … Apple showed its global superiority with its Vision Pro glasses in short 🙂
Welcome gentleman Turkmen! 😄 There is no doubt that the Palestinian proverb expresses the superiority shown by Apple in the Vision Pro glasses. It is certain that Apple has provided advanced technologies that are not to be reckoned with, and benefit from the design of the operating system and the hardware itself. But do not forget that Mark Zuckerberg believes that this high quality comes at a high cost and does not target a wide audience. Time will see how this competition will affect the augmented reality industry! 🚀🍏