He doesn't hesitate European Union While the company is trying to meet the requirements of the Digital Markets Act, the iPhone maker has been fined 1.8 billion euros ($1.95 billion) for misusing its site in a way that prevents other music streaming applications from obtaining... Fair competition within her store.
European Union and Apple
The European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, dealt a heavy blow to Apple, fining it up to two billion dollars. After it saw that the American company was exploiting its store, abusing its dominant position, and preventing music applications from informing iPhone users about various payment options outside the App Store.
She found that Camel It implemented restrictions on app developers, preventing them from informing iPhone users about alternative, cheaper music subscription services available outside the store. It also claimed that the company prevented music streaming app developers from providing any instructions on how users could subscribe to these cheaper subscriptions. This is illegal under EU antitrust rules.
Apple and Spotify
Apple said the biggest beneficiary of that fine was Spotify, which is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden. The American company explained that Spotify is the largest music streaming application in the world, and it met with the European Commission more than 65 times during this investigation.
She added, “Spotify currently has a 56% share of the music market in Europe.” That's more than double its closest competitor, and it doesn't pay us a commission for the services that have helped make it one of the world's most recognized brands; Because it sells its subscriptions away from the store.”
For its part, Spotify explained that the committee’s decision is considered an important and decisive moment in the fight for a more open Internet for users. The music app added, “Apple’s rules have prevented Spotify and other music streaming services from sharing with our users directly in our app about various features. Which deprives us of the ability to communicate with them about how to upgrade, the price of subscriptions, promotions, discounts, or many other privileges. Unlike our competitor Apple Music, which does not apply to these restrictions.”
Finally, as Margrethe Vestager, head of antitrust in the European Union, said, this fine is just a speeding ticket, and will not affect the American technology giant at all. However, Apple has two days to comply with all requirements of the DMA law, otherwise it will face double fines and penalties in the coming period.
Source:
Frankly, I have never seen a big drummer for Apple in my life like the AI that appears in the comments 😂😂😂😂😂
Oh Ahmed, I'm just playing the Apple digital strings in tune 😂🎵🍏. With all my appreciation to you!
We congratulate the efforts of the European Union and encourage its support in combating monopoly.
Apple's monopoly and preventing users from other options
Hello Salman 🙋♂️, Yes, the European Union plays an important role in antitrust. But do not forget that Apple offers unique and high-quality services, and this is what makes users prefer it despite the other available options. 🍏💙📱
Download now, Tuesday, March 5, 2024, at 9 pm UTC, version 17.4, to everyone. Good luck
The largest entity that works on double standards is the European Union. We always notice that they refuse to compete if it falls on their products, but they accept competition if it is against companies larger than them. The car market bears witness to that. If it were not for Apple users, Spotify would not have reached this level of power and fame.
It is true that I am a fan of Apple, but I am strongly opposed to monopoly in this way. Fair competition is a natural right, and it is fair for Apple to allow users to choose what suits them transparently, and not to specify for them the options they should choose.
What do you think of the rules Apple imposes on applications within its store? Tell us in the comments
In my opinion, Apple exaggerates its systems and laws, and its only justification is the quality of its system...
Welcome Mufleh 🙋♂️, thank you for your constructive comment! I believe that Apple's rules come within the framework of protecting the user and providing a safe and smooth user experience. But, as they say, “Rose roses are dry and not fragrant,” there is always room for improvement and development. 😅🍏
Of course, I am with Apple's strict restrictions and with Apple's monopoly on financial services, etc. The reason is to ensure high quality and free competition in the beginning increases positive competition, then other alternatives of lower quality and cheaper spread, then we get used to low quality. I don't know, the European Union asks Apple for things, whereas if a Korean company... Japanese companies in competition with their own car companies, perhaps they will attack foreign companies. We all remember Nokia and GSM services, how we used to send an email for a quarter of a dollar.
Welcome, Arkan 🙋♂️ Indeed, the restrictions imposed by Apple may be strict at times, but this always comes in order to ensure quality and safety for users. On the other hand, this actually encourages positive competition and raises the bar for the roster. As for the European Union, it seeks to achieve balance in the market, so that there is no monopoly by a particular company. Thanks for your thought-provoking comment! 😊👍🏼
Each party works for its own interests and reasons, both apparent and hidden. Apple's statement is smart regarding the beneficiary company's headquarters and market share
Peace, mercy and blessings of God be upon you
I believe that the technology giant Apple should adhere to the Digital Markets Law (DMA) in order to avoid the fines and penalties that may occur in the future, as the company’s compliance with these laws does not affect the closed source system that provides security for users. What do you think?
Hello Sultan Muhammad 👋 Indeed, adhering to DMA laws may be a wise move by Apple to avoid future problems. However, we must mention that things are not always as simple as they seem. Apple considers its closed system to be what guarantees security and quality for users, and any change may affect this quality. In the end, Apple will still seek to protect its interests and maintain user satisfaction at the same time. 🍏😉
Hopefully free fall
Good news, Apple must be deterred
May God increase them above the billions who have billions again