Almost two years ago, we have seen an ongoing struggle between Apple and Qualcomm and a legal war between the two companies. And we talked about this conflict several times like explaining the beginning of -this link- As well as its developments and how we are the real loser in this conflict -this link-. However, with several issues being resolved and others approaching their final stages, we had to rethink together the entire conflict and ask. Who is the real culprit in the Apple Qualcomm conflict?

From the villain in the Apple Qualcomm struggle

Important clarification

This article will be divided into 3 sections, the first is to explain the mistakes of Apple that make you support the viewpoint of Qualcomm, and the second is the mistakes of Qualcomm that make you stand on the side of Apple, then clarify and a final word from iPhone Islam regarding this conflict. Therefore, it is necessary to follow the entire article to form a complete and correct view of the conflict.

Trespassing villain Apple

Apple started the legal war against Qualcomm for reasons that have been repeated several times, and we will separate them in the following paragraph, such as "licensing fees." But yesterday a mail leaked between the head of Qualcomm with Apple Vice President Jeff Williams in which it was clearly shown that "Jeff" is seeking to ignore the issues and showcase the importance of commercial cooperation between the two companies and that they want Qualcomm to provide them with the SIM cards for their next phones. "The conversation in 2017 which phones are the next 8 / X “Here is the response of the president of Qualcomm, also surprisingly, that he also ignored the issues and expressed that there is a concern and a problem they have, which is that there is a leak of“ software ”of Qualcomm in favor of the companies of his competitor.“ It is intended that Apple transfers Qualcomm technologies to its competitor Intel, ”commented Jeff On this, he showed his admiration and said that he was ready to provide a firewall "intended to enhance security and that these leaks, if any, are due to espionage and breaches and not from Apple." He made it clear that with this firewall, nothing would leak out; Here, the head of Qualcomm commented that in this case his company agreed to provide Apple with the SIM cards. In other words, nothing was mentioned regarding the licensing fees and the source of the disagreement. This explains that the main problem with Qualcomm is that it sees Apple stealing its technologies and transferring them to Intel and other companies in order for them to develop and then leave Qualcomm and transfer to them.

If these messages were leaked months ago, we could have said that these doubts about Qualcomm are just accusations. But looking at two months ago, we find that Apple obtained a court ruling against it in China for violating Qualcomm software and patents and its use in the iOS system, and Apple's response was what? It said these claims are in technologies that were abandoned in iOS 12 that was released after Qualcomm filed the case. That is, Apple was aware and decided to amend it in iOS 12 to precede the judgment and secure itself. Indeed, Apple did an additional update to China, only modifying some things to save itself, and this additional update came a few days after the ruling, which means that the company was working on it; Is it possible that Apple suddenly invented some things and added them in days?

Let us leave China and look at Germany, where Apple was ruled to prevent the sale of the iPhone 7 and iPhone 8 for violating the patents of your company, and the court said that it is not Apple itself who violates them, but companies that manufacture hardware for devices that obtained Qualcomm technologies and used them to develop equipment that they sold to Apple. It is a strange coincidence to find that the head of Qualcomm says that Apple is leaking its technology to companies, and after a year you find a court ruling saying that the companies of his competitor to Qualcomm are using their own technologies to manufacture hardware for the iPhone.

Apple might be the villain who steals Qualcomm's technology and leaks it to its competitors, and Qualcomm has been defending its right.

Qualcomm's greedy scalper

Another aspect revealed by the cases is how greedy Qualcomm is. So, Qualcomm launched cases against Apple in the European Union, and during the European Union examination of the cases, it was found that Qualcomm was already far superior to its competitors, and by researching the reasons, it was found that it was complicating monopolistic violations. In the past, Qualcomm had agreed with major companies, headed by Apple, to provide them with technologies at very low prices that their competitor could not Its introduction and in return it has a monopoly on the supply for several years. This made the competitor find no one to sell to him and thus achieve losses, so that he spent less on development because there was no income; In return, Qualcomm guaranteed a steady flow of money to the monopoly of supply for years, and from here it spent with confidence on research, development and excellence. This led the European Union to fine Qualcomm 1 billion euros (1.2 billion dollars).

Once again, we return to the same previous conversation and find that the head of Qualcomm, after Jeff Williams reassured him that there will be no leak of technologies, said that he agreed to sell Qualcomm to Apple chips, provided that Apple contracts with it for at least two years and that the purchase percentages are not less than 50% of the number of iPhones. Sold. That is, Qualcomm wants to block the way for competitors, so even if one of them can develop a better chip, Apple will only buy 50% of it from it, with a maximum limit.

Go back to the European issue and see what happened after Qualcomm's monopoly; Years passed and competitors lagged behind, led by Intel, and Qualcomm became the best in the market without a competitor, and here it began to increase prices until it reached $ 30 from each device sold, especially as it applies the double-profit policy, so you should buy a SIM card as well as pay usage fees for the chip. That is, companies are not entitled to use the chip they have purchased without paying the usage fees. Imagine with me that Apple tells you to buy an iPhone and then pay an additional fee to be allowed to use the phone.

This chip and license fee approach has been in place since ancient times, and Apple was already paying, but because they were getting premium prices, the total was reasonable for them. But after the monopoly of Qualcomm and raising the prices, Apple refused these amounts and filed the cases.

It is worth noting that Qualcomm has similar agreements with all major companies. But Samsung may have obtained a different agreement. At first, Samsung began to sue Qualcomm because of the high fees. Here, Qualcomm’s handling of the case differed, because Samsung is a sophisticated company in the field of communication chips and processors, so Qualcomm concluded a large agreement as a result of which the fees are reduced to half for Samsung. As well as cooperation with Samsung in the field of 5G networks, and in return, Samsung is expanding the use of Qualcomm technologies, on top of which are processors, so do not be surprised that Samsung's “S and Note” phones always come out with its Exynos processor, but the global version comes with the famous Qualcomm Snapdragon processor. SD although sometimes the Samsung processor is faster. Samsung also obtained Qualcomm's approval to reintroduce QC 2.0 charging technology with a new name for Samsung, Adaptive Charging.

Qualcomm carried out monopolistic practices to kill competition and then began to demand huge sums of money and blackmail companies without licenses, not chips

Comment iPhone Islam

I know that some are waiting for us to mention who is wrong and who is right, or maybe they expect us to defend Apple as some people think that we always do. But the truth is "No Comment". The matter is not a dispute between 2 friends, so we will find out who is right. This is a trade struggle between companies and each company has sought to exploit; Apple agreed to enter into a monopoly agreement with Qualcomm, weakening Intel, and now it pays the price. Kualcom exaggerated the fees, conditions and restrictions, which made companies look for an alternative at any price, even if it is illegal. Look at the judgments issued, whether in China, Germany, Europe or East Asia, and you will find that Apple loses "patent infringement" cases and your agency loses in "monopoly" cases.

Corporations decide not right or wrong, but interests and profits

Who do you see the villain in the conflict Qualcomm and Apple? Or do you agree with us that the language of interests always settles decisions? Share your opinion in the comments

Sources:

NYT | Reuters | MacRumors

Related articles