The conflict still rages on strongly between Apple And Epic As the scene drew to a close, Apple added some spice to fuel the situation as the company described the developer of Fortnite as a chase horse and the main engine hidden from view.
Apple's battle against IPIC
Apple's battle with Ipic may be nearing the end, but Apple refused to pass the matter without problems and moved to a new level of conspiracy after it indicated that the game maker of Fortnite was a horse chasing the software giant Microsoft.
By "stalking horse" or a stalking horse, it means that a party enters into a challenge or conflict with another party on behalf of a third party. The idea of a stalking horse came from hunting where birds fled as soon as humans approached, but they were lenient with the presence of animals, and this is why the hunters used their horses. Walking next to it or using shapes made in the shape of a horse to approach the birds far enough and shoot them.
As for Apple, it sees IPIC as a stalking horse that was used to enter a battle against it on behalf of Microsoft, which saw it in its interest to stay away and not attract attention.
Apple, Microsoft, and Epic
As you know, Apple's legal battle with Epic revolves around the 30% commission that Apple receives from in-app purchases in the iOS app store, as the Fortnite game owned by Epic has been removed after adding an alternative payment system to the Apple Store system.
As for Microsoft, it is a little different. Where the policy of the Apple Store, which can be described as arbitrary, has prevented Microsoft from adding its Xbox Cloud Gaming service to the store.
Microsoft was struggling to provide its xCloud or Xbox Game Streaming services to the iPhone and iPad, but those services were being rejected even though there are similar interactive apps in the Apple Store such as Netflix, and of course the accusations were that the rejection was because Apple did not want For the presence of gaming services competing for its gaming service, Apple Arcade.
A report by Bloomberg revealed that the Cupertino giant asked a judge in a new file on Wednesday to ignore the testimony of Laurie Wright, an Xbox executive and who was the outside witness who previously answered questions from an Epic attorney about Microsoft's Xbox store.
Apple also claimed in its file on Wednesday that five witnesses from Epic in the ongoing trial are related to Microsoft, and the list includes Susan Athey of Stanford University, who refused to view confidential documents brought by Apple due to her previous consulting work with Microsoft.
Additionally, Apple has complained that the software giant has not disclosed internal communications and that Microsoft has held talks with Epic about the latter's strategy to avoid paying Apple's app store tax.
"These internal communications are particularly relevant in light of Microsoft's relationship with at least five Epic witnesses and the possibility that Microsoft could use Epic as a proxy plaintiff in a lawsuit that refuses to be sued in its name," Apple wrote.
Microsoft responded
“Apple is trying to distract from the legitimate concerns of many companies across the industry about its app store policies and practices, including its refusal to allow games to be broadcast, and Epic speaks and acts on its own behalf,” Microsoft said in a statement. Concerns themselves, including communicating directly with Apple itself.
Finally, Apple CEO Tim Cook is set to testify today and it will be interesting to see whether or not Microsoft will participate again in the dispute.
Source:
18 comment