a few days ago, Samsung announced About its new flagship devices from the Galaxy S22 series, and despite the newness of the phone and its new specifications, it seems that it does not live up to the iPhone 13 level when it comes to raw performance. Learn about the results of the tests between the latest Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max phones, And the latest Samsung flagship phones.

iPhone 13 Pro Max performance test against Samsung S22 Ultra

Shortly after the Samsung event, and the disclosure of the specifications of the new phone, experts mentioned that the Apple A15 Bionic chip is still superior to the Snapdragon 8 1 generation chip found in the latest Samsung phones, and this was supported by analyzes and numbers as it will come.

Conducted by Sacha Segan from the site PCMag Some actual performance tests, where the iPhone 13 Pro Max, Apple's highest phone, and Samsung's flagship S22 Ultra, the pinnacle of Android technology, and the fastest Android phone, against each other, these two phones are undisputedly the best phones.

Segan notes that Qualcomm has made impressive upgrades to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor compared to last year's Snapdragon 888, boosting single-core performance by 13% and multi-core performance by 9%. The GFXBench graphics benchmark also shows a noticeable 20% progression between the two chips, although Segan notes that this was somewhat dependent on working conditions on the phone.

Qualcomm's chip also outperformed Google's custom-designed Tensor chip, which is used in its latest Pixel 6 phones, but it turns out it doesn't even come close to Apple's A15 Bionic processor.

As Qualcomm takes incremental steps forward in terms of performance strength, Apple is making huge leaps that make it difficult to catch up with it rather than skip it.

Looking at the test result, the S22 Ultra and S22 Plus score five on the Geekbench benchmark which is just over 1200 for single-core performance, while coming in the 3400 range for multi-core. Last year, the S21 Ultra and the Pixel 6 were close in terms of single-core speeds, though Samsung's Qualcomm 888 processor beat Google's Tensor more easily in multi-core scores.

On the other hand, the iPhone 13 Pro Max outperforms all this, with a multi-core score of 4647, a 35% increase over the faster Samsung S22. In basic performance, the iPhone 13 Pro Max made a difference of 40% faster than the S22 Ultra.

Even when running on just one core, the A15 is just over half the speed of the first generation Snapdragon 8 processor, which runs on all cores.

The iPhone showed greater progress when comparing machine learning results, with a score of 948, significantly ahead of the S22 Ultra, which got a score of 448. These are the scores that are important and needed when it comes to features such as computer photography, speech recognition and handwriting.

The iPhone 13 Pro Max also took the lead in the Basemark Web tests, scoring twice as fast as any Samsung model. However, Segan also attributes this to the differences between the Safari browser and the Google Chrome browser on Android phones.

Heat affects the performance of new Samsung devices

It also appears that Qualcomm and Samsung weren't able to address heat issues with the new processor, as Seguin found that the S22 Ultra quickly got warm while running benchmarks, and results quickly fell much lower, indicating processor throttling, and he stated that he was a little concerned about the thermal throttling he saw. On the S22 Ultra, the Geekbench score went from 1232 to 802 when the phone got warm, and the GFXBench score went down from 28 fps to 19 fps.

Further tests showed that the S22 Ultra and S22 Plus throttle more than their predecessors, with performance dropping to 75% after about 15 minutes. Segan did not comment on whether this is a hardware or software issue, it could be resolved in a future update.

In comparison, the iPhone 13 Pro Max does not have a performance throttling at all. Although chips can be hotter, Apple can manage heat in a more efficient manner. He didn't say much about that when it came to the A-series chips used in the iPhone and iPad, but it's not really surprising given what they've done with the M1 family of processors in their latest MacBooks, which all work perfectly and are cooler. And good use of energy, unlike competing processors from Intel.

It is worth noting that the iPhone 13 Pro Max with the A15 processor was used in the tests, knowing that the iPhone 13 lineup all use the same processor, so these results should be the same.

There were no indications that Apple was throttling processor speeds on lower models; The Geekbench 5 scores for all four devices are the same. However, non-Pro iPhone 13 models have one lower GPU core, so graphics performance will be slightly lower than their Pro counterparts.

Conclusion

It's clear that Apple is still very much ahead with the Apple Silicon, and that's likely to increase even more with this year's A16 chip. And while the benchmarks don't tell the whole story when it comes to smartphone performance, it's still a good indicator of how well some of the most demanding apps perform on these devices.

What do you think of these tests and do you see them as realistic or prejudiced on the most powerful Android devices on the planet? Tell us in the comments.

Source:

pcmag

Related articles