iPhone 13 Pro Max performance test against Samsung S22 Ultra

a few days ago, Samsung announced About its new flagship devices from the Galaxy S22 series, and despite the newness of the phone and its new specifications, it seems that it does not live up to the iPhone 13 level when it comes to raw performance. Learn about the results of the tests between the latest Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max phones, And the latest Samsung flagship phones.

iPhone 13 Pro Max performance test against Samsung S22 Ultra


Shortly after the Samsung event, and the disclosure of the specifications of the new phone, experts mentioned that the Apple A15 Bionic chip is still superior to the Snapdragon 8 1 generation chip found in the latest Samsung phones, and this was supported by analyzes and numbers as it will come.

Conducted by Sacha Segan from the site PCMag Some actual performance tests, where the iPhone 13 Pro Max, Apple's highest phone, and Samsung's flagship S22 Ultra, the pinnacle of Android technology, and the fastest Android phone, against each other, these two phones are undisputedly the best phones.

Segan notes that Qualcomm has made impressive upgrades to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor compared to last year's Snapdragon 888, boosting single-core performance by 13% and multi-core performance by 9%. The GFXBench graphics benchmark also shows a noticeable 20% progression between the two chips, although Segan notes that this was somewhat dependent on working conditions on the phone.

Qualcomm's chip also outperformed Google's custom-designed Tensor chip, which is used in its latest Pixel 6 phones, but it turns out it doesn't even come close to Apple's A15 Bionic processor.

As Qualcomm takes incremental steps forward in terms of performance strength, Apple is making huge leaps that make it difficult to catch up with it rather than skip it.


Looking at the test result, the S22 Ultra and S22 Plus score five on the Geekbench benchmark which is just over 1200 for single-core performance, while coming in the 3400 range for multi-core. Last year, the S21 Ultra and the Pixel 6 were close in terms of single-core speeds, though Samsung's Qualcomm 888 processor beat Google's Tensor more easily in multi-core scores.

On the other hand, the iPhone 13 Pro Max outperforms all this, with a multi-core score of 4647, a 35% increase over the faster Samsung S22. In basic performance, the iPhone 13 Pro Max made a difference of 40% faster than the S22 Ultra.

Even when running on just one core, the A15 is just over half the speed of the first generation Snapdragon 8 processor, which runs on all cores.

The iPhone showed greater progress when comparing machine learning results, with a score of 948, significantly ahead of the S22 Ultra, which got a score of 448. These are the scores that are important and needed when it comes to features such as computer photography, speech recognition and handwriting.

The iPhone 13 Pro Max also took the lead in the Basemark Web tests, scoring twice as fast as any Samsung model. However, Segan also attributes this to the differences between the Safari browser and the Google Chrome browser on Android phones.


Heat affects the performance of new Samsung devices

It also appears that Qualcomm and Samsung weren't able to address heat issues with the new processor, as Seguin found that the S22 Ultra quickly got warm while running benchmarks, and results quickly fell much lower, indicating processor throttling, and he stated that he was a little concerned about the thermal throttling he saw. On the S22 Ultra, the Geekbench score went from 1232 to 802 when the phone got warm, and the GFXBench score went down from 28 fps to 19 fps.


Further tests showed that the S22 Ultra and S22 Plus throttle more than their predecessors, with performance dropping to 75% after about 15 minutes. Segan did not comment on whether this is a hardware or software issue, it could be resolved in a future update.

In comparison, the iPhone 13 Pro Max does not have a performance throttling at all. Although chips can be hotter, Apple can manage heat in a more efficient manner. He didn't say much about that when it came to the A-series chips used in the iPhone and iPad, but it's not really surprising given what they've done with the M1 family of processors in their latest MacBooks, which all work perfectly and are cooler. And good use of energy, unlike competing processors from Intel.

It is worth noting that the iPhone 13 Pro Max with the A15 processor was used in the tests, knowing that the iPhone 13 lineup all use the same processor, so these results should be the same.

There were no indications that Apple was throttling processor speeds on lower models; The Geekbench 5 scores for all four devices are the same. However, non-Pro iPhone 13 models have one lower GPU core, so graphics performance will be slightly lower than their Pro counterparts.


Conclusion

It's clear that Apple is still very much ahead with the Apple Silicon, and that's likely to increase even more with this year's A16 chip. And while the benchmarks don't tell the whole story when it comes to smartphone performance, it's still a good indicator of how well some of the most demanding apps perform on these devices.

What do you think of these tests and do you see them as realistic or prejudiced on the most powerful Android devices on the planet? Tell us in the comments.

Source:

pcmag

20 comment

comments user
hussein

Frankly, I was using Android. The first thing I downloaded was the Galaxy S21 Ultra. I sold it and took the iPhone 11. Then I used the iPhone 13 Pro Max and I hated Android after I used the iPhone.

    comments user
    SvHsw

    I am an Android user. It is true that the S21 was somewhat of a failure, but the previous Samsung phones and the new ones, especially the S22 series, are wonderful and very successful.

comments user
sleep

It gives you all wellness

comments user
Abdullah

The article is for comparison of the speed of the processors and is not praise or slander for a specific party, and he does not have to make a decision, you are free to whatever you see fit for you. You do not have to dictate to me what I choose and what I see as appropriate for me, and in return, I do not have to command you to like what I like or hate what I hate. The article is not for the preference of one over the other, but rather a comparison in terms of processor speed and performance. It's like comparing a XNUMX-cylinder car with a XNUMX-cylinder car, you are free to choose which one to choose and you decide what suits you best.

14
comments user
Abdullah Salahuddin

If you care about the privacy and protection of yourself and your children, I advise you not to leave the iPhone 😊 If you want an open source and anonymous application logo and you are not afraid of stealing your photos and data

8
5
    comments user
    Mohammed

    All my life I have been using Android, there is nothing in the App Store, eavesdropping and other things are all lies. Oh God, they listen to me. Why and what do I have at all 😂, and as for data theft, it is not for anyone I know or for me? It was a message that kills you on the iPhone, a device that lowers the volume of YouTube, lowers the volume of calls and how many times it causes me embarrassment, I am an Android user, all the words are not true, and I challenge anyone to prove that he was tapped and his data was stolen, the gaps we see on the iPhone, it happened to secure your device to fill a gap I'm talking to you and I'm a user of two systems and for years I've been using Android, but God forbid me and I took the bad male iPhone and repented I took it again. This is life. There is no lesson for free.

    6
    11
    comments user
    Mohammed

    Imagine saying I don't buy a computer because it has viruses 😂 You and your use are protecting yourself, someone who is carrying from a suspicious place and wants to be safe!! The same thing with Android, the issue of being restricted because of viruses. This is a stupid thing. If one does not know about the open system, it is only viruses. This is not a technology. I am not marketing why, so I can be shocked.

    10
    5
comments user
Abdullah Salahuddin

I swear to God, if they give me all Samsung products and Google use their phone, my answer will be no, and a thousand has no privacy, and an app store has a garbage dump and the focus of viruses, thefts and eavesdropping 😂 Let me be better silent

7
6
comments user
sasa

The iPhone remains the undisputed leader.

11
8
comments user
Kaled alfz

If I owned an iPhone or Galaxy...
I gave everyone who praised my company something in return..
But what about you, this is better and this is not better.

Required
Everyone says I only like a certain company..

God save everyone

6
5
comments user
Ahmed Ibrahim 0 dome

The iPhone remains the undisputed leader.

12
8
    comments user
    Abdullah Salahuddin

    Since the iPhone XNUMXG, I have not left a mobile phone, I have not tried it, and I have returned to the iPhone

    8
    4
comments user
Mohammed

Soon I will sell scrap iPhone and take the S22, Yazin Al-Hurriya

9
16
    comments user
    NizaR

    As for me, I am from 2009 and I use the iPhone year by year to iPhone 12 Pro. It only sat with me for two months and I sold it

    And soon, buy a s22 Ultra, the phone is worth every riyal

    In general, Android is a beautiful world

    I lost all of my life on the iPhone

    9
    10
comments user
Abu Meshal

I wish I could see your Samsung processor numbers

4
2
comments user
MrZaKaRiA

The results are correct, but their analysis is completely wrong, and this is surprising from the efficiency and scientific integrity of the iPhone Islam. Samsung devices provide a real IP68 standard without setting the condition of 6 meters within 30 minutes, like Apple, and this makes the processor heat up in some cases - as mentioned by the comparison owner - while using performance measurement applications , The user will not run such applications every morning to see performance and work on a busy device all day!!

The processor performance of a device cannot be compared to Dex ready to turn into a full desktop at any moment you connect it to a large screen, a device that has a stylus with many features ready directly when you pull it out of the device that no company has been able to offer so far, and other features are ready for use as it works in the background all the time

As for the iPhone, it only runs one application at a time, and if you go to another application to take quick information, you will find it reloads when you return to it, and this is a handicap that cannot be compared even with a traditional calculator, let alone the 22 ultra

Not to mention the type c 3.2 connector and the iPhone is still on a stone age connector

So the bottom line is that the 22 ultra is light years ahead of the iPhone.
In conclusion, there are other valid points with which you can print on the iPhone, but not the cracked CD for the performance of the processor.

22
30
    comments user
    Abu Meshal

    What I liked most about what you wrote is that the world stands helpless in the face of a great invention whose name was changed from Note to S Ultra.

    10
    1
comments user
Happy

Samsung splash technology

20
10
comments user
Assokkar

Be realistic and look at the comparisons, as the Galaxy excels in almost everything.

11
31
comments user
Ahmed Alansari

The iPhone remains the undisputed leader.

22
9

Leave a response

We are not responsible for any misuse of the information mentioned above. IPhone Islam is neither affiliated nor represented by Apple. IPhone, Apple and any other product name, service names or logos referenced herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Apple Computer.

العربية简体中文NederlandsEnglishFilipinoFrançaisDeutschΕλληνικάहिन्दीBahasa IndonesiaItaliano日本語한국어كوردی‎فارسیPolskiPortuguêsРусскийEspañolTürkçeУкраїнськаاردوTiếng Việt